<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Re-evaluation of Shor's Algorithm · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0612077/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0612077/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Re-evaluation of Shor's Algorithm — mentioned by smaddox</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16330557</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0612077:16330557</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 06:15:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps I don&amp;#x27;t, but your description doesn&amp;#x27;t seem to contradict my point that scalability is distinct from competitive with classical computing. Perhaps people also implicitly mean &amp;quot;scales faster than a classical computer&amp;quot;, in which case I did indeed misunderstand. On the topic of whether or not the need for averaging is already accounted for in algorithmic complexity, my understanding is that it is not. This [1] preprint from 2006 seems to support my understanding. If you have evidence to the contrary, I would greatly appreciate a link. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0612077&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0612077/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
