<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum mechanics without measurements · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0612065/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0612065/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum mechanics without measurements — mentioned by codehotter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3591826</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0612065:3591826</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:12:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Those interested in quantum mechanics, and that find the &amp;#x27;textbook interpretation&amp;#x27; (the copenhagen interpration) or the &amp;quot;many worlds/everett&amp;quot; interpration frustratingly unintuitive, may find the decoherent/consistent histories interpretation interesting. That interpretation provides an intuitive way to reason about quantum mechanics and therefore makes it much easier to learn how quantum mechanics works, without getting distracted by paradoxes and philosophical difficulties. To learn more, Read a paper by one of decoherent histories&amp;#x27; main proponents http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0612065 See…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0612065/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
