<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Against `Realism' · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0607057/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0607057/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Against `Realism' — mentioned by jere</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4724194</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0607057:4724194</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:57:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the explanation. I was still confused about how &amp;quot;things actually are material and unchanging&amp;quot; led to &amp;quot;reality does not exist when we are not observing it.&amp;quot; You pointed me in the right direction though and I&amp;#x27;m convinced that the term is being abused by the caller: &amp;gt;Realism in the sense used by physicists does not equate to realism in metaphysics. The latter is the claim that the world is in some sense mind-independent http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_realism#Local_realism http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0607057v2.pdf If papers are being written about how &amp;quot;local realism&amp;quot; should be…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0607057/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
