<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The role of the rigged Hilbert space in Quantum Mechanics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0502053/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0502053/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The role of the rigged Hilbert space in Quantum Mechanics — mentioned by bollu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24090116</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0502053:24090116</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2020 08:44:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I am glad you brought up bra-ket notation. I have wasted a lot of time trying to understand how to formalize bra-ket notation. I kept seeing the words &amp;quot;C* algebra&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;rigged hilbert space&amp;quot; being thrown around. I recently learnt the full story: - Von Neumann&amp;#x27;s paper &amp;quot;mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics&amp;quot;[http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~davide/The_Mathematical_Foundatio...] builds up hilbert space theory and solves problems without ever using dirac deltas. So if one wants to use bra-ket without dirac deltas, this is the formalism. - To make dirac deltas themselves precise, forgetting the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0502053/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
