<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0412078/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0412078/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit — mentioned by jessriedel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4888600</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0412078:4888600</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:05:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;FYI, the shot noise limit is one which exists when experimentalists are restricted to &amp;quot;classical&amp;quot; techniques, i.e. they don&amp;#x27;t use unusual quantum input states or measurements. That&amp;#x27;s probably a reasonable assumption for anything that could make it into a consumer product, but &amp;quot;quantum-enhanced measurements&amp;quot; can do better. Giovannetti et al.&amp;#x27;s article is pretty good for those with the background: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/306/5700/1330 http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0412078&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0412078/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
