Properties of the frequency operator do not imply the quantum probability postulate · HackerPapers discussionshttps://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0409144/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMTProperties of the frequency operator do not imply the quantum probability postulate — mentioned by n4r9https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20928533urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0409144:20928533Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:24:58 GMT<p>Interesting. Following through the citations, this statement seems to be based on two quite old articles which criticise a different Born rule formulation based on frequency analysis: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02058273 https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0409144.pdf The latter article is more recent at 2005 but as far as I can tell Carroll&#x27;s self-locating uncertainty ideas weren&#x27;t introduced until around 2014.</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0409144/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>quant-ph