<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Macroscopic Thermodynamical Witnesses of Quantum Entanglement · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0406040/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0406040/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Macroscopic Thermodynamical Witnesses of Quantum Entanglement — mentioned by dawnofdusk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45464918</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0406040:45464918</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 16:43:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Although I am not an expert in quantum information, I think the problem you pose is resolved by the fact that the no-signalling theorem is about measurements of a quantum state, which is a microscopic state, and heat transfer is a measurement of a thermodynamic quantity, which is macroscopic. In much the same way that measuring the temperature of a classical gas doesn&amp;#x27;t give information on the location or momenta of the constituent particles, a thermodynamic probe of entanglement doesn&amp;#x27;t necessarily furnish precise information on how a state is entangled (e.g., Eq. 2 in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0406040/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
