<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>George Boole and the Bell inequalities · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0406004/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0406004/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>George Boole and the Bell inequalities — mentioned by GistNoesis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27095376</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0406004:27095376</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2021 12:18:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Replying here due to max comment depth tree, to explain in more detail. About the link between boole&amp;#x27;s and bell&amp;#x27;s inequalities : There are tons of paper : A quick search for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0406004.pdf (I just skimmed it for a few seconds but it&amp;#x27;s probably talking about the right thing) In the paper you suggest https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949, there is nothing which looks like a probability definition. Assuming the world is using continuous fields, defining the probability for what register as a discrete event like a &amp;quot;blip&amp;quot; must be done carefully, it&amp;#x27;s not a trivial…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0406004/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
