HackerPapers

arXiv:quant-ph/0405039quant-ph

Are All Particles Identical?

Sheldon Goldstein, James Taylor, Roderich Tumulka, Nino Zanghi

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We consider the possibility that all particles in the world are fundamentally identical, i.e., belong to the same species. Different masses, charges, spins, flavors, or colors then merely correspond to different quantum states of the same particle, just as spin-up and spin-down do. The implications of this viewpoint can be best appreciated within Bohmian mechanics, a precise formulation of quantum mechanics with particle trajectories. The implementation of this viewpoint in such a theory leads to trajectories different from those of the usual formulation, and thus to a version of Bohmian mechanics that is inequivalent to, though arguably empirically indistinguishable from, the usual one. The mathematical core of this viewpoint is however rather independent of the detailed dynamical scheme Bohmian mechanics provides, and it amounts to the assertion that the configuration space for N particles, even N ``distinguishable particles,'' is the set of all N-point subsets of physical 3-space.

arXiv comments
12 pages LaTeX, no figures
Journal reference
J.Phys.A38:1567-1576,2005
DOI
doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/7/012
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jul 2019 to Mar 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • Bohmian mechanics is based on the idea that we perceive stuff to be in a certain position in a single reality because there is a correspondence to stuff being actually there. That's nice. If the particles are surfing a wave and not impacting it, so be it. It is also rather nice…

      jostylrView on HNParent context

  1. The Trouble with Many Worlds 1 comment
    • > "points on the screen" is the only reason we have to believe in particles There are also the cloud chamber paths. But more generally, I would say most people's experiences correspond closer to stuff having well-defined localization which is more in the ballpark of particles…

      jostylrView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.