<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Are All Particles Real? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0404134/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0404134/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Are All Particles Real? — mentioned by jostylr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12378408</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0404134:12378408</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2016 20:38:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Particles can interfere with themselves in the double-slit experiment if they are being guided by a wave. This explains wave behavior and particulate events as in Bohm&amp;#x27;s theory. Sadly, there are issues with photons as particles as their wave equations do not seem to allow for an easy particle interpretation unlike, say, electrons. Of course, the flexibility of QM allows for electrons to have a particle existence and photons to not: http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0404134 (I am a coauthor of that paper) And some videos to answer questions about BM: http://www.bohmian-mechanics.net/videos_faq.html&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0404134/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
