<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum Quandaries: a Category-Theoretic Perspective · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0404040/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0404040/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum Quandaries: a Category-Theoretic Perspective — mentioned by Kednicma</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24152253</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0404040:24152253</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 01:45:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Of course we do not expect you to know about category theory, nor do we want to encourage you here to do so.&amp;quot; Ugh. Well, I can encourage you to do so, with some Baez [0][1]. [0] http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/rosetta.pdf [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0404040&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0404040/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
