HackerPapers

arXiv:quant-ph/0401052quant-ph

In defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory

Robert W. Spekkens

Abstract

We present a toy theory that is based on a simple principle: the number of questions about the physical state of a system that are answered must always be equal to the number that are unanswered in a state of maximal knowledge. A wide variety of quantum phenomena are found to have analogues within this toy theory. Such phenomena include: the noncommutativity of measurements, interference, the multiplicity of convex decompositions of a mixed state, the impossibility of discriminating nonorthogonal states, the impossibility of a universal state inverter, the distinction between bi-partite and tri-partite entanglement, the monogamy of pure entanglement, no cloning, no broadcasting, remote steering, teleportation, dense coding, mutually unbiased bases, and many others. The diversity and quality of these analogies is taken as evidence for the view that quantum states are states of incomplete knowledge rather than states of reality. A consideration of the phenomena that the toy theory fails to reproduce, notably, violations of Bell inequalities and the existence of a Kochen-Specker theorem, provides clues for how to proceed with this research program.

arXiv comments
32 pages, REVTEX, based on a talk given at the Rob Clifton Memorial Conference, College Park, May 2003; v2: minor modifications throughout, updated references
Journal reference
Phys. Rev. A 75, 032110 (2007)
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032110
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Aug 2020 to Oct 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2020 to Jul 2020. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • Robert W. Spekkens (and I guess Matt Leifer) tried to model quantum uncertainty classically. (my gut feeling was: it works till it does not work) "In defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory" https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0401052

      hackandthinkView on HNParent context

    • As a fellow non-expert, I use tables like [0] to help keep everything straight. Yes, the Copenhagen interpretation says that the wavefunctions we manipulate are epistemic; they exist in our mind and on the blackboard but not necessarily IRL. The epistemic toy theory [1] makes…

      KednicmaView on HNParent context

    • Recall that "ontic" and "epistemic" are how we distinguish real facts about reality from observer-dependent knowledge about reality. On your (1), the typical interpretations for QM say that the wavefunction is not ontic, and this is directly traceable to the Copenhagen school of…

      KednicmaView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.