<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum Information and Relativity Theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0212023/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0212023/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum Information and Relativity Theory — mentioned by Kell</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7027943</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0212023:7027943</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:35:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I&amp;#x27;m happy to tell you that you should read a bit about the No-Communication Theorem. Here, this post explain it fairly well : http://lesswrong.com/lw/q2/spooky_action_at_a_distance_the_n... Maybe that (non peer reviewed) author at nature should read it too. The wikipedia page for the no communication theorem is fine too. Or this technical article : http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0212023.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0212023/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
