<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes — mentioned by floxy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40918647</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0210150:40918647</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 17:26:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone know if there has been follow up to Caroline Thomphson&amp;#x27;s work after she passed away? https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes — mentioned by flubert</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27896707</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0210150:27896707</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:36:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This is the first of a set of papers that look at actual Einstein-Podolksy-Rosen (EPR) experiments from the point of view of a scientifically and statistically literate person who is not a specialist in quantum theory.&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9611037 ...I wonder if anyone has ever followed up on Caroline Thompson&amp;#x27;s work after she passed away. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes — mentioned by flubert</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10508968</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0210150:10508968</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 19:29:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The &amp;quot;Chaotic Ball&amp;quot; model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes — mentioned by GregBuchholz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9097587</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0210150:9097587</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:51:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not a physicist, but I&amp;#x27;ve always wondered about Caroline Thompson&amp;#x27;s work, like: &amp;quot;Chaotic Ball&amp;quot; model, local realism and the Bell test loopholes http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150 ...any thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes — mentioned by GregBuchholz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8299898</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0210150:8299898</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:28:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not a physicist, but I&amp;#x27;ve always wondered about Caroline Thompson&amp;#x27;s work, like: &amp;quot;Chaotic Ball&amp;quot; model, local realism and the Bell test loopholes http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes — mentioned by GregBuchholz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7967786</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0210150:7967786</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:18:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;Plus, how do we rectify it with Bell&amp;#x27;s theorem on hidden variables? I&amp;#x27;m not a physicist, but I&amp;#x27;ve always wondered about Caroline Thompson&amp;#x27;s work, like: &amp;quot;Chaotic Ball&amp;quot; model, local realism and the Bell test loopholes http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes — mentioned by GregBuchholz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7259935</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0210150:7259935</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:26:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not a physicist, but I&amp;#x27;d be interested in people&amp;#x27;s opinions on: &amp;quot;Chaotic Ball&amp;quot; model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes — mentioned by GregBuchholz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4719544</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0210150:4719544</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:54:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Non-physicst here. What do you think of Caroline Thompson&amp;#x27;s work, like: &amp;quot;Chaotic Ball&amp;quot; model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150 ...I&amp;#x27;ve always wondered if much of the Einstein-was-wrong business is really a category error. I personally liked: Clearing up Mysteries - The Original Goal http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/articles/cmystery.pdf &amp;quot; ...we must keep in mind that Einstein&amp;#x27;s thinking is always on the ontological level; the purpose of the EPR argument was to show that the QM state vector cannot be a representation of the &amp;quot;real physical situation&amp;quot; of a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The "Chaotic Ball" model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes — mentioned by GregBuchholz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2768109</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0210150:2768109</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:52:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I found this paper interesting: The &amp;quot;Chaotic Ball&amp;quot; model,local realism and the Bell test loopholes (http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0210150/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
