Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) · HackerPapers discussionshttps://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0205039/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMTQuantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) — mentioned by n4r9https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20381193urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0205039:20381193Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:27:31 GMT<p>This thread is getting a lot longer and more involved than I anticipated. Apologies but for the sake of my own free time and sanity I may have to slow down and make more use of citations. The main point I was trying to get across was that QBism does say these things about quantum theory, regardless of whether or not you find it tenable. As I say the mathematics is invariant across interpretations, therefore the Born rule and POVMs have a use to an Everettian just as they do a QBist. The difference is what they think of the physical meaning of such a thing. [0][1] Interpreting quantum theory…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0205039/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>quant-ph