<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0105127/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0105127/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical — mentioned by stared</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43382968</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0105127:43382968</guid><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:11:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Wave functions are just a mathematical representation of a physical property that are (only?) ever operated on using quantum operators which result in a statistical distribution. It is not correct— at least not unless you subscribe to the Copenhagen interpretation. Yet, while this interpretation is a simple heuristic for interaction with big systems (e.g., a photon hits a CCD array), none of the quantum physicists I know treat it seriously (for that matter, I have a PhD in quantum optics theory). I mean, at some certain level, everything is &amp;quot;just a mathematical representation&amp;quot; - in the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0105127/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical — mentioned by stared</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37416636</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0105127:37416636</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 09:39:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This view on wave-particle duality and the quantum measurement is a (very) leaky abstraction. It is a process, governed by decoherence - for a nice overview, see e.g. &amp;quot;Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical&amp;quot; by Zurek (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105127).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0105127/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
