Quantum trajectories, real, surreal or an approximation to a deeper process? — mentioned by tagrun

Wed, 18 May 2016 19:15:02 GMT

No, I meant arXiv:quant-ph/0010020

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Quantum trajectories, real, surreal or an approximation to a deeper process? — mentioned by tagrun

Wed, 18 May 2016 05:24:35 GMT

You (and everyone who replied you so far) misunderstood: if you read the article, you'll see that this is not the issue. This is about the reality of trajectories built-into the pilot wave theory (such a concept which doesn't even exist in "text-book" interpretation of quantum mechanics, which says particles don't have positions or trajectories until you measure them, upon which they "decide" their position through an "artificial" process called wavefunction collapse; notably, as of now, wavefunction collapse and the reality of wavefunction is still a subject of debate). There was a paper…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Quantum trajectories, real, surreal or an approximation to a deeper process? · HackerPapers discussions

Quantum trajectories, real, surreal or an approximation to a deeper process? — mentioned by tagrun

Quantum trajectories, real, surreal or an approximation to a deeper process? — mentioned by tagrun