<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>One Complexity Theorist's View of Quantum Computing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0003035/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0003035/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>One Complexity Theorist's View of Quantum Computing — mentioned by abdullahkhalids</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26333332</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0003035:26333332</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:43:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It has been claimed that &amp;quot;we can simulate a BQP machine using efficiently computable entries from the set {−1, −4/5 , − 3/5 , 0, 3/5 , 4/5 , 1}&amp;quot; [1]. So any part of reality that you can reduce to an efficient computation on a quantum computer, admits a description using the rationals only. But I might be out of my depth here. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0003035&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0003035/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
