<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Experimental Test of Relativistic Quantum State Collapse with Moving Reference Frames · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0002031/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0002031/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Experimental Test of Relativistic Quantum State Collapse with Moving Reference Frames — mentioned by bentoner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=276521</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_0002031:276521</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:01:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Whoops, sorry. Suppose we try to explain quantum correlations by postulating that as soon as one member of an entangled pair of particles is measured, a very fast signal travels to its partner, updating its state. If the signal is instantaneous, then such a model is indistinguishable from quantum theory. But what if the signal is fast, but not infinitely fast? Salart and collaborators establish a lower bound on the speed of any such signal (it must be &amp;gt; 10,000 times the speed of light). But we have to be careful about which reference frame is used to define the velocity. Natural choices, such…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_0002031/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
