<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Propulsion Without Propellent Mass; a Time-Varying Electromagnetic Field Effect · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_9908048/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_9908048/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Propulsion Without Propellent Mass; a Time-Varying Electromagnetic Field Effect — mentioned by Terr_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8116700</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:physics_9908048:8116700</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:13:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Was it something like this? http://arxiv.org/html/physics/9908048v2/conclusion.htm &amp;gt; Then ring 1 would turn off, and by the time the wave from ring 2 reached it, there would be no interaction. That sounds like the magic part. &amp;quot;Magically, nothing will occur.&amp;quot; IANA physicist, but it sounds like Lenz&amp;#x27;s law might be relevant. &amp;gt; I believe the site said the process was [...] didn’t violate any laws of physics. Well, there&amp;#x27;s the rub. It sounds like it directly violates conservation of momentum and Newton&amp;#x27;s third law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_9908048/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.gen-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
