<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ranking Scientific Publications Using a Simple Model of Network Traffic · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0612122/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0612122/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Ranking Scientific Publications Using a Simple Model of Network Traffic — mentioned by Anon84</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=452242</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:physics_0612122:452242</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:47:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m surprised they have just now noticed this. Redner&amp;#x27;s and Maslov&amp;#x27;s papers have been making the rounds in academia for at least two or three years. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0612122 http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0604130&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0612122/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
