<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Theory of aces: high score by skill or luck? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0607109/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0607109/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Theory of aces: high score by skill or luck? — mentioned by namirez</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21379720</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:physics_0607109:21379720</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:05:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;For Jobs to understand this and bet his career on it ... he deserves the place and high-regard in technological history he has been given I&amp;#x27;m sure Jobs was brilliant, but this kind of praise still reminds of this Enrico Fermi&amp;#x27;s story [1]: During the &amp;quot;Manhattan project&amp;quot; (the making of nuclear bomb), physicist Enrico Fermi asked General Leslie Groves, the head of the project, what is the definition of a &amp;quot;great&amp;quot; general. Groves replied that any general who had won five battles in a row might safely be called great. Fermi then asked how many generals are great. Groves said about three out of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0607109/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
