<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Teaching Earth Dynamics: What's Wrong with Plate Tectonics Theory? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0510090/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0510090/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Teaching Earth Dynamics: What's Wrong with Plate Tectonics Theory? — mentioned by logicallee</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10686917</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:physics_0510090:10686917</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:18:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Arxiv is pretty much for all. What you call vouching is just endorsement, and it&amp;#x27;s not peer review at all. what I got Googling &amp;#x27;pseudoscience arxiv&amp;#x27; - http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+AND+marvin+herndon/0/1/0/al... These titles wouldn&amp;#x27;t even make it past HN&amp;#x27;s front page, they would be flagged - by lay people with no background. Let me emphasize: arxiv is not peer-reviewed, it is an open publication platform. Out of the above list, I only clicked through one - http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0510090 reading &amp;quot;Teaching Earth Dynamics: What&amp;#x27;s Wrong with Plate Tectonics Theory?&amp;quot; Quote: &amp;quot;I review what…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0510090/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.ed-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
