<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Philosophy Enters the Optics Laboratory: Bell's Theorem and its First Experimental Tests (1965-1982) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0508180/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0508180/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Philosophy Enters the Optics Laboratory: Bell's Theorem and its First Experimental Tests (1965-1982) — mentioned by leoc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41905496</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:physics_0508180:41905496</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:58:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s not the case that Bell etc. were simply overlooked: the whole question of experimental tests of interpretations of quantum mechanics was actively stigmatised and avoided by physicists until well into the &amp;#x27;70s, at least. Clauser couldn&amp;#x27;t get a job in the area. https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508180&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0508180/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.hist-ph</category></item><item><title>Philosophy Enters the Optics Laboratory: Bell's Theorem and its First Experimental Tests (1965-1982) — mentioned by leoc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26693082</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:physics_0508180:26693082</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2021 21:42:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Feynman enjoyed holding forth about philosopy of science, demarcation and so on but there doesn&amp;#x27;t seem to be much evidence that he had unusually good judgement on those issues: https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508180 . But then Michael Jordan and Cristiano Ronaldo aren&amp;#x27;t particular authorities when it comes to questions of good sportsmanship. &amp;gt; Independent of his admitted naiveté and the job crisis in American physics, it is interesting to record how some leading physicists reacted to the physics he was doing. Clauser (2002a, p.71) reports that while he &amp;quot;was actually performing the first…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0508180/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.hist-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
