<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Maximum force and minimum distance: physics in limit statements · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0309118/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0309118/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Maximum force and minimum distance: physics in limit statements — mentioned by pdonis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37202852</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:physics_0309118:37202852</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 20:53:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; (the minimum value of entropy) seems to come from an extremely hand-wavy argument So does the &amp;quot;maximum force&amp;quot; argument, which is given in this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0309118 It is, to say the least, not generally accepted as a valid argument.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0309118/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.gen-ph</category></item><item><title>Maximum force and minimum distance: physics in limit statements — mentioned by snarfy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33422050</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:physics_0309118:33422050</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 14:55:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;this is better [1] [1] - https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0309118&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/physics_0309118/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.gen-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
