<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Complexity of Langton's Ant · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/nlin_0306022/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/nlin_0306022/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Complexity of Langton's Ant — mentioned by eternalban</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24581070</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:nlin_0306022:24581070</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 17:27:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; the point that dr. Stephen Wolfram has been making for years? Stephen Wolfram, along with many others (predating him): An example. Note the dates. (A New Kind of Science is from 2002.) http://csc.ucdavis.edu/~chaos/Publications/JPC-Publications.... Also see: Chris Langton: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Langton C. Langton, Studying arti􏱆cial life with cellular automata, Physica D 22 (1986) 120–149. Complexity of Langton’s ant: https://arxiv.org/abs/nlin/0306022&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/nlin_0306022/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.CG</category></item></channel></rss>
