<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Categorification · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_9802029/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_9802029/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Categorification — mentioned by JadeNB</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17705557</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:math_9802029:17705557</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:41:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a pleasant but intentionally very elementary summary of the relevant concepts. If you&amp;#x27;re interested in much more on this, one place to start is MO (https://mathoverflow.net/questions/4841/what-precisely-is-ca...), or the n-Category Café (https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/10/what_is_categor...), or Baez&amp;#x27;s TWF 121 (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week121.html). Warning: all are much math-ier than Riehl&amp;#x27;s very nice slides, although the first one has enough content that you may find an answer that you like. If your math itch still isn&amp;#x27;t scratched, there&amp;#x27;s Baez and Dolan&amp;#x27;s paper…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_9802029/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.QA</category></item></channel></rss>
