<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of the Mandelbrot set and Julia sets · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_9201282/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_9201282/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of the Mandelbrot set and Julia sets — mentioned by oarabbus_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21887964</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:math_9201282:21887964</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2019 00:06:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;There is a common misconception, repeated here, that fractals are defined by their self-similarity. This is not a misconception. Self-similarity at all length scales is indeed a defining factor of fractals. From that fact it _does_ follow that _most_ fractals have a non-integer fractal dimension. However it is absolutely not true that fractals have non-integral dimensionalities; for example the most famous fractal of them all, the Mandelbrot set, has an integer Hausdorff dimension of 2. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9201282&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_9201282/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
