<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Flat Surfaces · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0609392/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0609392/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Flat Surfaces — mentioned by mrcactu5</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12823968</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:math_0609392:12823968</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:01:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The only map I can think of from the sphere to the plane (and periodically tiles) uses genus 0 Riemann surfaces and quadratic differentials. And I know he didn&amp;#x27;t do that. Nonetheless, there&amp;#x27;s a fascinating work by Anton Zorich called &amp;quot;Flat Surfaces&amp;quot; (it&amp;#x27;s a great discussion with lots of pictures)) https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0609392 The geodesics on a flat plane is the straight line -- while the geodesics on a sphere are the great arcs. So there has to be a fair amount of distortion. I could imagine just drawing a map of the world on the surface of a cube instead of a sphere. That might come…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0609392/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
