<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0606441/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0606441/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25082769</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:math_0606441:25082769</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:51:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0606441/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.ST</category></item><item><title>Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress — mentioned by tel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6634020</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:math_0606441:6634020</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:52:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The two cultures argument is strong, but so is David Hand&amp;#x27;s &amp;quot;Illusion of Progress&amp;quot; paper [1] which fits into the debate by highlighting that classifier technologies often touted by machine learning aficionados does not scale to better performance when analyzed carefully. In my experience, improvements in performance tend to come from improvements in domain knowledge. This usually plays out in feature selection, but may involve radical changes in the classifier/model design. The secondary ones are more fun and can more easily be the basis of a PhD. The initial ones are usually swept under the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0606441/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.ST</category></item><item><title>Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4474034</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:math_0606441:4474034</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:10:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Classiﬁer Technology and the Illusion of Progress&amp;quot; by David J. Hand&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0606441/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.ST</category></item><item><title>Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress — mentioned by mdda</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3904679</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:math_0606441:3904679</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:51:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Direct link : http://arxiv.org/pdf/math.ST/0606441.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0606441/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.ST</category></item></channel></rss>
