arXiv:math/0501401math.PR
The overhand shuffle mixes in $Θ(n^2\log n)$ steps
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
The overhand shuffle is one of the ``real'' card shuffling methods in the sense that some people actually use it to mix a deck of cards. A mathematical model was constructed and analyzed by Pemantle [J. Theoret. Probab. 2 (1989) 37--49] who showed that the mixing time with respect to variation distance is at least of order $n^2$ and at most of order $n^2\log n$. In this paper we use an extension of a lemma of Wilson [Ann. Appl. Probab. 14 (2004) 274--325] to establish a lower bound of order $n^2\log n$, thereby showing that $n^2\log n$ is indeed the correct order of the mixing time. It is our hope that the extension of Wilson's lemma will prove useful also in other situations; it is demonstrated how it may be used to give a simplified proof of the $Θ(n^3\log n)$ lower bound of Wilson [Electron. Comm. Probab. 8 (2003) 77--85] for the Rudvalis shuffle.
> You need about 10000 (ten thousand) of them to shuffle an ordinary deck of 52 cards. My source[0] says the lower bound for full overhand shuffle is number of cards squared, so less than 3000 shuffles for 52 cards. Upper bound around 5000. Your source? [0]…
strogonoffView on HNParent context