<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why everyone should know number theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0210327/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0210327/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Why everyone should know number theory — mentioned by mananaysiempre</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31644072</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:math_0210327:31644072</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 18:38:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You have seen the Ulam spiral[1] from 1963, right? I don’t know that it provides any actual insight into this stupenduously complicated[2] topic, but if you want something to draw about prime numbers that’s probably the best-known option. Or see the story about “primons”[3] for a view that’s less visual but no less tangible (given a certain kind of background at least). And yes, as you note, your CDF very much looks like a square grid after an inversion. That is to say: draw a square grid on a horizontal plane, lay down a ball on that plane, project the image onto the surface of the ball by…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0210327/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
