<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On Khovanov's categorification of the Jones polynomial · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0201043/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0201043/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On Khovanov's categorification of the Jones polynomial — mentioned by throw_away_8080</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35351886</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:math_0201043:35351886</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 03:18:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to clarify, I am not trivializing the work of category theorist. It is a field of mathematics which provides a useful framework for algebraic geometers and algebraic topologists, and has even been fruitfully applied outside of math. A personal favorite of CT generalizing an existing idea is in knot theory the khovanov homology detects the unknot, which is an amazing feat for a knot invariant. Bar Natan covers the construction well: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0201043 However for some reason this particular field of math is a lightning rod for quacks. I don&amp;#x27;t really know why, but that is…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0201043/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.QA</category></item><item><title>On Khovanov's categorification of the Jones polynomial — mentioned by mrcactu5</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6883837</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:math_0201043:6883837</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:28:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Courses would benefit from &amp;quot;quick-reference guides like the end of Dror Bar Natan&amp;#x27;s paper on Khovanov homology http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0201043 He says &amp;quot;It can fit inside your wallet.&amp;quot; See: http://www.math.toronto.edu/drorbn/Talks/HUJI-011104/cube.gi...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math_0201043/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.QA</category></item></channel></rss>
