<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Classical and Quantum Probability · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math-ph_0002049/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math-ph_0002049/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Classical and Quantum Probability — mentioned by phayes</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19315457</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:math-ph_0002049:19315457</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:23:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Both monism and many worlds can be avoided, but only when one either changes the formalism of quantum mechanics—typically in ways that are in conflict with Einstein’s theory of special relativity—or if one understands quantum mechanics not as a theory about nature but as a theory about knowledge: a humanities concept rather than science.&amp;quot; Tut-tut. There&amp;#x27;s nothing &amp;quot;humanities rather than science&amp;quot; about the understanding that QM is &amp;#x27;just&amp;#x27; probability theory https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601158 https://terrytao.wordpress.com/tag/noncommutative-probabilit...…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/math-ph_0002049/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
