<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Noncommutative Perturbative Dynamics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_9912072/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_9912072/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Noncommutative Perturbative Dynamics — mentioned by KolenCh</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30595211</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-th_9912072:30595211</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:42:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Summary: # Background material - Fundamental (particle) Physics has no progress since the 1970s. - discovery of Higgs is confirmation of old Physics. - other predicted fundamental particles has never been discovered. - Fine tuning problems - smallness of Higgs mass - smallness of the cosmological constants - reductionism as Kenneth Wilson&amp;#x27;s concept of effective field theory (EFT) - separation of scales—UV (small scales) can be treated as a cut off of IR (large scales). # Main message The 2 fine tuning problems above are examples that are UV-sensitive, unlike other usual examples in EFT. This…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_9912072/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
