<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>(Non)perturbative gravity, nonlocality, and nice slices · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0606146/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0606146/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>(Non)perturbative gravity, nonlocality, and nice slices — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18337951</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-th_0606146:18337951</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:56:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; more response than I was expecting, thank you. You&amp;#x27;re welcome. &amp;gt; evaporating black hole must be leaking its information to somewhere The information about the contents of the BH during its formation and growth is in the region of strong gravity. Classically, it&amp;#x27;s squashed into the gravitational singularity; fully classically the singularity is always hidden behind an event horizon, so it does no harm to predicting events outside the horizon. However, we now add a quantum field theory to the picture. The origin of Hawking radiation is the acceleration between observers before the formation…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0606146/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
