<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Populating the Landscape: A Top Down Approach · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0602091/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0602091/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Populating the Landscape: A Top Down Approach — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11162055</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-th_0602091:11162055</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:29:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Another alternative was proposed by Hawking &amp;amp; Hertog (Phys Rev D, 2006, see below): walk the present values surface back to a superposition of possible universes and study the mechanisms that generate probabilities near one. That then is their way of asking about the degree of fine-tuning, with the anthropic principle being recasta as a constraint on the set of possible consistent histories. H&amp;amp;H spend a lot of time comparing themselves to the approach of selecting an initial values surface in the early universe and marching it forward; they more or less do the same but flip the direction of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0602091/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
