<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Casimir Effect and the Quantum Vacuum · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0503158/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0503158/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Casimir Effect and the Quantum Vacuum — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45547776</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-th_0503158:45547776</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:30:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Note the paper discusses some proposals of positive-energy warp drives. The well-known Alcubierre drive[1] requires negative energy density. So while it dodges the critique of this paper, negative energy is highly likely to be unphysical. And no, what Michio Kaku fantasized on that Discovery show won&amp;#x27;t work as the Casimir effect isn&amp;#x27;t due to vacuum energy[2][3] and thus you can&amp;#x27;t get negative energy that way. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive [2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04143 [3]: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503158&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0503158/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>The Casimir Effect and the Quantum Vacuum — mentioned by Retric</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39956461</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-th_0503158:39956461</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 23:00:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My posts had no deeper meaning. I personally don’t feel elegant mathematics really implies anything about the physical universe, but that doesn’t imply anything beyond the need for experimental evidence. &amp;gt; What model do you prefer for vacuum energy? The standard model seems fine without vacuum energy &amp;gt; 0. ex: https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0503158.pdf Are you aware of any experiment that suggests it, beyond the apparent acceleration of the expansion of the universe? Because IMO an explanation that only shows up after an observation and also only applies to a single observation isn’t a deeper…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0503158/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>The Casimir Effect and the Quantum Vacuum — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29469156</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-th_0503158:29469156</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 04:47:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I was under the impression the paper by Jaffe[1] showed the negative energy explanation[2] was not physical, but totally not my field. [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503158v1 [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Relativistic_va...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0503158/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>The Casimir Effect and the Quantum Vacuum — mentioned by posix_me_less</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25100319</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-th_0503158:25100319</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:28:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There are different explanations, but the original one (zero-point energy) is very heuristic, involving operations with infinity. There are more physical explanations in terms of physical EM interactions (van der Waals forces), see https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0503158.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0503158/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>The Casimir Effect and the Quantum Vacuum — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19481144</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-th_0503158:19481144</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:08:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;AFAIK the Casimir force is due to the van der Waals force between the plates, so doesn&amp;#x27;t that spoil the negative energy party from the get-go? https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04143 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503158&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-th_0503158/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
