The debate between loop quantum gravity and string theory is sometimes lively, and it is hard to present an impartial view on the issue. Leaving any attempt to impartiality aside, I report here, instead, a conversation on this issue, overheard in the cafeteria of a Major American University.
Linked by 4 identifiable commenters in 4 comments across 4 threads, from Oct 2012 to May 2022. Found in 1 HN submission from Oct 2012 to Oct 2012. Open submission discussions.
I use this on several of my sites as well. None of them get any significant amount of traffic, so I figured it would be okay to add more names to the list, as a small token of keeping their memory alive. Browsing the web with the Clacks Overhead extension for Chrome…
I know absolutely nothing about physics. But I still found this paper enjoyable to read, because it's written in the format of a discussion between fictional characters: https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0310077v2.pdf
I'm in string theory as well, most of my knowledge about LQG is mostly from other string theorists. From my experience, string theorists can be extremely hostile towards the ideas in LQG and the people involved in it. So I would not quite share your view. Then from LQG there is…
First, advice about arXiv.org links: for me, at least, it's nice to see a link to the main abstract page rather than directly to the full PDF. Here, that link would be http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0310077 And second, this isn't "When physicists chat over lunch". This is "A nine…
I use this on several of my sites as well. None of them get any significant amount of traffic, so I figured it would be okay to add more names to the list, as a small token of keeping their memory alive. Browsing the web with the Clacks Overhead extension for Chrome…
PseudomanifoldView on HNParent context