<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>High-Energy Tests of Lorentz Invariance · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_9812418/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_9812418/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>High-Energy Tests of Lorentz Invariance — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12385194</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-ph_9812418:12385194</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:48:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Special relativity is defined by invariants on the Minkowski metric ds^2 = dx^2 - dt^2 using general coordinates and setting c to unity. This is a generalization of the Euclid metric ds^2 = dx^2. (In Cartesian coordinates and in 2d, ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2). Just as the Euclidean metric fails on a gridded plane where one would instead use the Taxicab metric (ds = \sum _{i=1}^{n}|p_{i}-q_{i}|), and the problem persists to higher spatial dimensions, the 3+1 Minkowski metric of Special Relativity fails on a discretized spacetime, and one would have to use a metric appropriate for whichever…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_9812418/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
