<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Pooltable Analogy to Axion Physics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_9506229/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_9506229/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Pooltable Analogy to Axion Physics — mentioned by saboot</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9615373</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-ph_9506229:9615373</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 00:32:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps, but this has been the case for a long time. Maxwell-Faraday Equations, differential geometry and curvature tensors for general relativity, matrix mechanics and operators for quantum mechanics. Most of the past physics seems much simpler partly because the teaching methods and more direct derivations have been developed in the large span of time since they were discovered. For a background about the physics discussed, check out The Pool-Table Analogy with Axion Physics http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9506229&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_9506229/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
