Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam · HackerPapers discussions

Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam — HN submission

Tue, 06 Feb 2024 15:42:13 GMT

Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam (2003)

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam — HN submission

Tue, 06 Feb 2024 06:42:55 GMT

Destruction of nuclear bombs using ultra-high energy neutrino beam (2003) [pdf]

131 points; 137 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam — HN submission

Mon, 05 Feb 2024 20:34:29 GMT

Remote Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam [pdf]

5 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam — HN submission

Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:11:40 GMT

Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam (2003)

113 points; 85 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam — mentioned by idlewords

Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:59:40 GMT

There's a fun paper on how you could use a particle accelerator to blow up nuclear weapons in their silos from the other side of the planet with a neutrino beam. There would be no defense against this (highly fanciful) countermeasure. https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0305062.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam — mentioned by idlewords

Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:55:29 GMT

There was a nice paper a few years back suggesting essentially the same thing as a method for detonating other people's nukes: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0305062

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.