<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Strong Dynamics and Electroweak Symmetry Breaking · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_0203079/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_0203079/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Strong Dynamics and Electroweak Symmetry Breaking — mentioned by mnl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24873097</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-ph_0203079:24873097</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 19:42:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, for instance EWSB by strong dynamics such as Technicolor. Here&amp;#x27;s a well known review from back in the day: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0203079 I&amp;#x27;m not sure we&amp;#x27;re done with composite models. There are more exotic alternatives and then the fact remains that neutrino masses aren&amp;#x27;t in the SM. I consider pretty hopeless to keep thinking that you can modify GR like plasticine in all the instances in which putting amounts of matter that doesn&amp;#x27;t radiate works (maybe it works because it&amp;#x27;s there and its effects on other stuff is how you &amp;quot;see&amp;quot; it). It has the appeal of making some people feel…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_0203079/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
