<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fundamental Constants at High Energy · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_0201198/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_0201198/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fundamental Constants at High Energy — mentioned by oneshtein</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41871073</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:hep-ph_0201198:41871073</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:18:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Aren&amp;#x27;t gravitational waves the same effect I described? I cannot read your mind. &amp;gt; c is an universal constant and it seems that you&amp;#x27;re saying that it is not! Yep, c is universal constant for many physical models. In physical world, c is constant as long, as properties of physical vacuum (permitivity and permeability) are constant, which in turn depends on α (Fine-structure constant[1]), which, in turn, variates at higher energies[2]. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant [2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0201198&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/hep-ph_0201198/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
