<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Generalization Of Lorentz-Poincare Ether Theory To Quantum Gravity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9706055/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9706055/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Generalization Of Lorentz-Poincare Ether Theory To Quantum Gravity — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31298196</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_9706055:31298196</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2022 20:22:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We have been done a disservice by being supplied a link to the PDF, rather than the abstract https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9706055v1 The pdf version is somehow showing a date in 2021, although this is clearly a 1997 preprint. SemanticStrength&amp;#x27;s reply to you also implies this was written in the 90s. The PDF has the 1997 date on the clickable link back to the arxiv, so there is some time-travel going on that I do not understand. The date of the preprint is important context, for reasons I&amp;#x27;ll return to at the end, wrt your point about the CMB. &amp;gt; huge red flags Are there? I&amp;#x27;m not sure I agree. &amp;gt;…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9706055/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>Generalization Of Lorentz-Poincare Ether Theory To Quantum Gravity — mentioned by SemanticStrengh</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31290590</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_9706055:31290590</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 23:24:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The unification is a solved problem, as always it&amp;#x27;s simply that the solutions are ignored by the scientific community. see e.g. the first valid cannonical quantization of Gravity https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9706055.pdf GR and QM are fundamentally incompatible and will never be, however one can fork either GR or QM to reconciliate them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9706055/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>Generalization Of Lorentz-Poincare Ether Theory To Quantum Gravity — mentioned by SemanticStrengh</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31229095</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_9706055:31229095</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2022 21:57:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;However, as underappreciated as it is, statistical theories are efficient maps, not territories. Quantum mechanics is a clever way to maximize knowledge and minimize unknowns but in all honesty it does not represent at all reality, only a knowledge map, and therefore famous paradoxes become apparent artifacts of those leaking abstractions. Theories that have actual causal content would necessitate some explanations of what is going on, AKA hidden variables theories, however the search space is huge and the usefulness not that high. However the double slit experiment is still a real mystery…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9706055/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>Generalization Of Lorentz-Poincare Ether Theory To Quantum Gravity — mentioned by SemanticStrengh</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31213749</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_9706055:31213749</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 06:04:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the scientific problems (diseases, quantum gravity, etc) have been resolved, it&amp;#x27;s just that no one knows it. Because researchers are paid to produce new papers, but nobody is paid to extensively read the ocean of existing papers. Cancer? PNC-27 + thymalin Ageing? Skq1 + Epitalon Quantum gravity? https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9706055.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9706055/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
