<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Junctions and thin shells in general relativity using computer algebra I: The Darmois-Israel Formalism · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9510052/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9510052/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Junctions and thin shells in general relativity using computer algebra I: The Darmois-Israel Formalism — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20744008</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_9510052:20744008</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:09:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;To me, General Relativity has some pleasing qualities: it&amp;#x27;s mathematically complete, and it&amp;#x27;s very flexible. As to the Einstein Field Equations (EFEs) themselves, the aesthetically pleasing quality is the terse notation brought about by the Einstein summation convention, abstraction into the Einstein tensor G_{\mu\nu}, the stress-energy-momentum tensor T_{\mu\nu} and other objects, and so forth (it&amp;#x27;s even shorter with geometrized units c = G = 1, ignoring the cosmological constant (say if one relies on thin shells and junctions[1]), \pi = 1, and/or 0 on the RHS). This terseness can hide…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9510052/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
