<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9509057/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9509057/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36676001</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_9509057:36676001</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 03:11:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m quite happy to admit that I don&amp;#x27;t know the classical-quantum CQ programme well, and certainly not well enough to hazard a genuinely informed opinion that might take the form &amp;quot;it&amp;#x27;s a candidate for a fundamental theory&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;it&amp;#x27;s a candidate for a better EFT&amp;quot;. I think I can say it isn&amp;#x27;t obviously not one of those, though. Also, I&amp;#x27;m not ready to sloganize the work beyond &amp;quot;it&amp;#x27;s complicated&amp;quot;. A good entry point to CQ is Oppenheim&amp;#x27;s [hep-th] https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03116 &amp;quot;... invariant under spatial diffeomorphisms ... consistent ... completely positive, norm preserving, and linear in the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9509057/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
