<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Von Neumann Algebra Automorphisms and Time-Thermodynamics Relation in General Covariant Quantum Theories · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9406019/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9406019/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Von Neumann Algebra Automorphisms and Time-Thermodynamics Relation in General Covariant Quantum Theories — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41753438</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_9406019:41753438</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2024 22:40:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t really understand what you&amp;#x27;re trying to say. I think there&amp;#x27;s two things going on in your comment: you want more information about emergent theories, and you want more information about how time emerges in a theory that is symmetrical under time reversal. For the first, perhaps you should try Sabine Hossenfelder&amp;#x27;s video and video-transcript at &amp;lt;https://backreaction.blogspot.com/2020/04/what-is-emergence-...&amp;gt; first, rather than something more technical. For the second: your paraphrasing, particularly &amp;quot;if you disagree your logic is broken&amp;quot; is in my view unfair to the quoted scientists…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9406019/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>Von Neumann Algebra Automorphisms and Time-Thermodynamics Relation in General Covariant Quantum Theories — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18502973</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_9406019:18502973</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:40:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; (or at all) Rovelli&amp;#x27;s position is that time is not fundamental, not that it does not exist. It emerges from something more fundamental. That is, he argues that there exists a theory (or family of theories) from which one can derive both General Relativity and Relativistic Quantum Field Theory in their effective limits, and that such a theory does not need to be paramaterized by time (or more broadly, does not need to explicitly reference the notion of time at all). More precisely, he and Connes propose[1] that statistical regularities in a generally covariant quantum system (our block…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9406019/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
