<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9310026/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9310026/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity — mentioned by mikhailfranco</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21133875</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_9310026:21133875</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2019 06:34:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think SW became too obsessed with the mathematical and computational approach to CA, while (as usual) &amp;#x27;t Hooft pursued his physics intuitions to create a candidate CA theory: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1548 I say as usual, because G&amp;#x27;tH had already formulated the holographic principles that would allow space-time (hence GTR) to be encoded non-locally over a graph. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9310026 There need not be a preferred reference frame if the space-time events do not occur at individual nodes in the graph, but emerge at scales much larger than the graph, with some holographic or…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_9310026/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
