<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Black hole formation in the head-on collision of ultrarelativistic charges · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0605131/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0605131/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Black hole formation in the head-on collision of ultrarelativistic charges — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41743803</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_0605131:41743803</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 17:51:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The idea of making the black hole membrane paradigm generally covariant and everywhere locally Lorentz invariant gives me a migraine. Dropping charges onto a superthin surface (and keeping it cold, we have to consider arbitrarily large SMBHs too) or having the superthin surface emit Hawking radiation is hard to make not-a-toy (step 0: spectral structure evolution; step 1: ultraboost something, Aichelburg-Sexl style pancake; step 2: astronomer near ISCO around a distant SMBH; step 3: Rindler particles from the membrane&amp;#x27;s pole; step 4: incoming ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, GZK-like cutoff…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0605131/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
